Talk:List of Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 operators

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Russian & Soviet CL‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

CL

This article has been rated as CL-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Referencing & Citation?

What exactly does it mean, "referencing and citation criterion not met"? Every entry has a tag referring to the source - or is that not what it is referring to? 2Q (talk) 01:21, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At the top of the page, this has been added: "This article includes a list of references or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate." In the first paragraph of the text, it's made rather plain: "All information in this section adapted from "MiG-21" by Yefim Gordon & Keith Dexter[1] unless otherwise noted." This *has* to be a better/nicer way of doing it than putting a ref tag after every sentence on the page... no? In Wikipedia:Citing Sources it says "If a source supports a significant amount of the material in an article, it may sometimes be acceptable to simply add the citation at the end." This is, essentially, what has been done, except at the beginning as well, for extra clarity. 2Q (talk) 05:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The massive use of the Gordon/Dexter book really needs more precise citing - i.e. page numbers.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:48, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mig-21m jrv.JPG Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Mig-21m jrv.JPG, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Mig-21m jrv.JPG)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:42, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MiG-21 UM FRY.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:MiG-21 UM FRY.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:MiG-21 UM FRY.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:00, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Number of MiG-21 operators gradually diminishing

This article should be updated to reflect the latest assessment of the strength of the world's air forces (http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace/media/reports_pdf/world-air-forces-2013-101015.aspx). 68.4.28.33 (talk) 17:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Flight International doesn't seem a reliable source at all concerning this topic, apparently they are listing many aircraft in service that in reality were retired many years ago - meaning in some cases, decades! Angola, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Sudan, Uganda, Yemen, Zambia all retired the type long ago now, but they are listed as operators. Apparently to the aforementioned source, if there is a 20-30 year old photo of it, it is still flying today. The information should be in sync with the mentioned air forces' wiki pages (many of them also don't seem to be very up to date though, as these countries don't hand out press releases in English about the inventory and status of their aircraft probably).

You are responding to a 2013 comment - so its not surprising that the 2013 Flight International article refers to inventories in service in 2013 and not in 2022.Nigel Ish (talk) 09:50, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21 operators. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150701034246/http://www.air-britain.com/namibia.pdf to http://www.air-britain.com/namibia.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]